FGV 2025.2Questão 34de 60A FRAGILE REFORM 1. For the past couple of years much of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia’s capital, was reduced to rubble
InglêsInterpretação de texto
Numeração da prova tipo 1.
A FRAGILE REFORM
- For the past couple of years much of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia’s capital, was reduced to rubble [escombros] by demolitions. Now luxury apartments, parks, and cycle lanes are rising from the ruins. Abiy Ahmed, Ethiopia’s prime minister, believes the old city must make way for a cleaner, shinier one. 2. Mr Abiy is transforming not just Addis, but Ethiopia. Long [por muito tempo] one of Africa’s state-controlled economies, the east African country of 135 million people has recently begun to liberalize. A year ago, not only did it allow the value of its currency, the birr, to be determined primarily by market forces of supply and demand, but it also entered an International Monetary Fund (IMF) program worth US$3.4 billion (3% of GDP). A number of reforms, if successful, will radically alter its economic system. “What they are trying to do is comparable to the transition economies after the fall of the Soviet Union,” says Steven Dercon of Oxford University, who has advised several Ethiopian governments on economic policy. Ethiopia hopes to follow the path of countries such as Poland and become an economic power. Yet it may end up looking more like Russia, its transition derailed by corruption, conflict, and chaos. 3. Following decades of Communist dictatorship, the government began to allow some space for free markets in the 1990s. But it retained tight restrictions on private enterprise, growing through debt-fuelled state investment in infrastructure. Yet since a sovereign default [não pagamento da dívida interna ou externa] in 2023, following a devastating civil war, forced Ethiopia to ask the IMF for a bailout [socorro financeiro], it has opened up banking, retail, and other sectors to foreign competition, and relaxed restrictions on repatriating profits. On July 1st parliament approved a law allowing foreigners to own property. The country plans to privatize some stateowned firms. In January it opened a stock exchange. 4. Economic performance has been encouraging, according to official data. The IMF estimates that the economy grew by 7.2% in the year to July 2025. But this rosy picture may not be the whole story. The IMF relies on government data for its estimates, but has repeatedly complained about “the quality and availability of economic statistics” in Ethiopia. Less
formal measures such as electricity demand indicate the economy is growing – but probably not as fast as official figures suggest. 5. Investors say that reforms have so far been superficial. A former executive at a multinational company says state-owned firms still enjoy unfair advantages. Others lament that Ethiopia’s economic system is still characterized by complex regulations, a bewildering bureaucracy, limited competition, and restricted imports. A good rule of thumb [regra informal mas prática], says one investor, is that anything not explicitly permitted is forbidden. 6. Moreover, corruption, which used to be relatively rare, seems to be increasing. In 2023 almost twothirds of Ethiopians felt it had increased in the past year, according to Afrobarometer, a public opinion research organization. Procedures such as applying for a passport have become impossible to complete without paying a bribe [suborno]. Some complain of having to grease official palms [subornar agentes do governo] just to pay tax. 7. Yet the most important barrier to investment in Ethiopia remains conflict: besides the insurgencies raging in the country’s two most populous regions, Oromia and Amhara, tensions with neighboring Eritrea continue to rise, in large part because Mr. Abiy has made no secret of his desire to grab that country’s Red Sea ports. Nothing deters investment like an imminent war. Adapted from The Economist, July 19th-July 25th 2025
The information in the article most likely supports all of the following except:
- Alternativa A: What Ethiopia is trying to do to its economy is not a new idea.
- Alternativa B: Ethiopia found itself in a position where it had to ask the IMF for help.
- Alternativa C, a correta: The fall of the Soviet Union had little effect on Ethiopia’s economy.Resposta
- Alternativa D: For years after abandoning communism, Ethiopia avoided implementing broad, comprehensive economic reforms.
- Alternativa E: Poland is probably a better and economically stronger country than Russia.
A questão pede a única afirmação que o artigo NÃO sustenta ("except", exceto).
Onde a União Soviética aparece:
Uma única vez, numa comparação feita por um economista: "What they are trying to do is comparable to the transition economies after the fall of the Soviet Union" (o que eles estão tentando fazer é comparável às economias de transição depois da queda da União Soviética). O texto usa a queda da URSS como termo de comparação e não diz nada sobre o efeito dela na economia etíope.
Conferindo a alternativa:
A alternativa A é sustentada. Ela diz que o que a Etiópia tenta fazer com a economia não é uma ideia nova. Se a reforma é "comparable to the transition economies" (comparável às economias de transição), outros países já fizeram algo parecido.
A alternativa B é sustentada. Ela diz que a Etiópia chegou a uma situação em que teve de pedir ajuda ao FMI. O texto: "a sovereign default in 2023 (...) forced Ethiopia to ask the IMF for a bailout" (um calote da dívida em 2023 obrigou a Etiópia a pedir socorro financeiro ao FMI).
A alternativa C não é sustentada, por isso é a resposta. Ela diz que a queda da União Soviética teve pouco efeito sobre a economia da Etiópia. O artigo não trata desse efeito, nem grande nem pequeno; só usa a transição pós-soviética como comparação.
A alternativa D é sustentada. Ela diz que, por anos depois de abandonar o comunismo, a Etiópia evitou reformas econômicas amplas. Nos anos 1990 o governo abriu só "some space for free markets" (algum espaço para o livre mercado), mas "retained tight restrictions on private enterprise" (manteve restrições rígidas à iniciativa privada); a abertura mais ampla só veio depois do calote de 2023.
A alternativa E é sustentada. Ela diz que a Polônia provavelmente é um país melhor e economicamente mais forte que a Rússia. A Etiópia quer "follow the path of countries such as Poland and become an economic power" (seguir o caminho de países como a Polônia e virar uma potência econômica), mas pode acabar como a Rússia, "derailed by corruption, conflict, and chaos" (descarrilada por corrupção, conflito e caos). A Polônia é o modelo de sucesso; a Rússia, o de fracasso.
A afirmação que o artigo não sustenta corresponde à alternativa C.
Confere com o gabarito oficial preliminar da FGV. Ver o caderno da banca