FGV 2025.2Questão 41de 60According to the information in the article, all of the following are related to Belarus’s 2020 presidential election
InglêsInterpretação de texto
Numeração da prova tipo 1.
Texto das questões 40 a 42
RESISTING A DICTATOR By Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya
(Note: Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya is the leader of the Belarusian opposition and head of the United Transitional Cabinet. She is currently living in exile in Lithuania.)
Belarus – nestled between the European Union, Ukraine, and Russia – has long been overlooked [esquecido, ignorado, despercebido] and underestimated by outsiders, who often see it as little more than an extension of Russia. This perception stems [resulta] largely from the grip [mão forte] of the country’s dictator, Alexander Lukashenko. Since 1994, he has transformed Belarus into a repressive state marked by fraudulent elections, systemic violence, and a deepening reliance on Moscow and Beijing. But five years ago, Belarusians made it clear that they do not want to live in a belligerent autocracy, isolated from the rest of Europe and the rest of the world. In 2020, I entered Belarus’s presidential election to stop Lukashenko from claiming a sixth term [mandato]. I didn’t expect to win; Lukashenko had rigged [fraudado] every previous contest. But my message – free the country’s political prisoners, end repression, hold real elections, and restore the rule of law [estado de direito] – struck a nerve. According to independent observers, Belarusians overwhelmingly voted for me. When Lukashenko declared himself the winner anyway, the country exploded in the largest peaceful uprising [revolta pacífica] in its modern history. Up to 1.5 million people flooded the streets of Belarusian cities demanding change. I did not intend to enter politics. I was an English teacher and then a full-time mother focused on helping my hearing-impaired son [filho com deficiência auditiva]. My husband, Siarhei Tsikhanouski, was the political one – an entrepreneur whose blog exposed the daily humiliations of life under dictatorship. His words inspired thousands. When he announced his candidacy in May 2020, the regime arrested him days later. I decided to run in his place – not out of ambition, but out of love. The response to the protests was brutal. To clear the streets, the regime carried out waves of mass arrests, engaged in widespread torture, and generally terrorized the populace. It detained tens of thousands of people, and it beat hundreds more. I was forced into exile, along with many others. But still, the uprising shook the regime to its core. The demonstrations might have succeeded, if not for Russian President Vladimir Putin. To prepare for his February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Putin needed Belarus as a launching pad. He thus propped up Lukashenko by sending security advisers and other kinds of operatives, providing financial assistance, and signaling a readiness to intervene more intensely – saving Lukashenko’s rule in return for obedience and Belarus’s subjugation. Today, my country remains under de facto Russian occupation. Nine million people are being held hostage by a regime that answers not to them, but to the Kremlin.
Adapted from Foreign Affairs, August 8, 2025
According to the information in the article, all of the following are related to Belarus’s 2020 presidential election except:
- Alternativa A: Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya’s husband presented himself to the Belarusian people as a pro-democracy candidate.
- Alternativa B, a correta: A significant presence of armed Russian troops in Belarus guaranteed Alexander Lukashenko’s permanence in power.Resposta
- Alternativa C: There is apparently strong support for Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya’s allegation that she was the real winner of the election.
- Alternativa D: According to Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, her entering the presidential race was essentially a last-minute decision.
- Alternativa E: The peaceful street protests against Alexander Lukashenko were not confined to the capital of Belarus.
A questão pede o fato que NÃO está relacionado à eleição presidencial de 2020, segundo o artigo ("except", exceto).
Como a Rússia aparece no texto:
O apoio russo é descrito assim: Putin "propped up Lukashenko by sending security advisers and other kinds of operatives, providing financial assistance, and signaling a readiness to intervene more intensely" (sustentou Lukashenko enviando assessores de segurança e outros tipos de agentes, dando ajuda financeira e sinalizando disposição de intervir com mais força). São assessores, agentes, dinheiro e uma ameaça de intervir, não tropas armadas. E o motivo apontado é a guerra seguinte: "To prepare for his February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Putin needed Belarus as a launching pad" (para preparar a invasão da Ucrânia em fevereiro de 2022, Putin precisava de Belarus como plataforma de lançamento).
A armadilha da "ocupação":
O texto diz "Today, my country remains under de facto Russian occupation" (hoje meu país continua sob ocupação russa de fato). "De facto" indica uma ocupação na prática, política: o regime "answers not to them, but to the Kremlin" (responde não a eles, mas ao Kremlin). Não é a descrição de tropas armadas mantendo Lukashenko no poder em 2020.
Conferindo a alternativa:
A alternativa A está relacionada. Ela diz que o marido de Tsikhanouskaya se apresentou ao povo como candidato pró-democracia. Ele tinha um blog que "exposed the daily humiliations of life under dictatorship" (expunha as humilhações diárias da vida sob a ditadura) e "announced his candidacy in May 2020" (anunciou a candidatura em maio de 2020).
A alternativa B não está relacionada, por isso é a resposta. Ela diz que uma presença significativa de tropas russas armadas em Belarus garantiu a permanência de Lukashenko no poder. O texto não fala em tropas: fala em assessores, agentes, ajuda financeira e disposição ("readiness") de intervir.
A alternativa C está relacionada. Ela diz que há, aparentemente, forte apoio à alegação de Tsikhanouskaya de que ela venceu de verdade. O texto: "According to independent observers, Belarusians overwhelmingly voted for me" (segundo observadores independentes, os bielorrussos votaram em peso em mim).
A alternativa D está relacionada. Ela diz que, segundo a autora, entrar na disputa foi basicamente uma decisão de última hora. Ela "did not intend to enter politics" (não pretendia entrar na política); o marido foi preso "days later" (dias depois) de se candidatar, e ela decidiu concorrer "in his place" (no lugar dele).
A alternativa E está relacionada. Ela diz que os protestos pacíficos não ficaram restritos à capital. O texto: "Up to 1.5 million people flooded the streets of Belarusian cities" (até 1,5 milhão de pessoas tomaram as ruas das cidades bielorrussas), cidades no plural.
O fato que o artigo não sustenta em relação à eleição de 2020 corresponde à alternativa B.
Confere com o gabarito oficial preliminar da FGV. Ver o caderno da banca
